Soccerholics >> Regulars
>> Articles
Boring, boring England
October 11th, 2006
©Soccerholics.com
|
|
Why
the surprise at England's poor form? Surely a nation that counts Peter Crouch
as their most potent weapon in front of goal can hardly be considered amongst
the world's best? Why is it that when England beat the Andorras and Faroe
Islands of this world (don't even get me started as to why these "teams" go
directly into the main qualification round) by eight goals the players are
hailed as the best things since 196... okay sliced bread? The 606 phone-in show
is jam packed with fans claiming "Gerrard is world class", "Becks (who?) had a
blinder", "Terry was a colossus".
And yet it is these same fans that call back ranting when the Three Lions are
brought back down to earth with a tame goalless draw at home nonetheless.
"Gerrard was shocking", "Me grandma could head the ball better than Crouch",
"Terry is a poor man's Nesta", "Was Lampard even playing?"
While both sets of reactions make some valid arguments, the truth lies
somewhere in between. England are good but not world class. Definitely not in
the top 10 footballing countries based on recent form going back 5 years. The
players huff and puff (a technique that works wonders in the Premiership) but
continuously fail to produce any end result. When Sven Goran Eriksson took over
the reigns 6 years ago he was blessed with "the best group of young players
England had ever seen". An experienced core of Campbell, Neville, Beckham and
Scholes added to the younger Gerrard, Owen, Ashley Cole and Heskey left
everyone dreaming of either a World Cup or European Championship by 2006.
However due to a combination of naive inflexible tactics and undeserved
favoritism Eriksson's reign is better remembered for the amount of times he
scored in the bedroom than his team did on the pitch. Fundamental questions
were never addressed: Where do you play Steven Gerrard? Should Beckham be
dropped until he regains his form? Is there no decent left sided midfielder in
England? Can Owen truly lead the line?
Had Eriksson made the decision early on to play Gerrard through the middle,
relegate David Beckham to the bench when he didn't perform, employ attacking
tactics that would suit not just Michael Owen but his strike partner, by now
the England team would have been more of a cohesive unit understanding exactly
what was expected of them.
In contrast when England plays you get the impression of players desperate to
believe their own press, but easily deflated at the realization of their
mediocrity after a bad result. The good news is that despite the lack of world
class talent available to them, England will forever be the most passionate
footballing nation in the world. The challenge that Steve McLaren now faces is
finding that fine balance allowing his team to maintain that defensive solidity
but giving more freedom to express themselves.
Players like Gerrard, Wayne Rooney and Joe Cole should more often than not be
told to go out and enjoy themselves, leaving the likes of Owen Hargreaves,
Peter Crouch or Dean Ashton and John Terry to play the calming influences. This
English generation of players still has one more chance to fulfill it's initial
potential, but only time will tell whether John Terry will be lifting the
European Championship two years from now. Their first job is getting there, and
what a job that is looking to be...
Email this page
| Site Map
| Report
errors |
Join our Team |
Link to us
|